The internet is great. With the world wide web we are connected like never before. News travels almost instantly and communities of like-minded individuals can easily come together and share their passion. Without the world wide web, witty and informative websites like Skinny Artist could never exist.
Unfortunately, as many of you already know, the internet has a dark-side as well. Search engines constantly demand fresh new content and those who are unwilling to create it have been known to steal other people’s content and pass it off as their own. Images are stolen off the web everyday as this poor family discovered after they posted this family portrait to their Facebook page:
According to the AP report, a family friend later recognized this same photo reproduced on a billboard in downtown Prague in the Czech Republic:
The sad truth is that this kind of thing is happening all the time and if you don’t think these thieves are out there trolling the web 24/7 looking for something they can rip-off, I know a Nigerian banker who would love to speak with you as soon as possible.
Even Deviants like you aren’t safe!
It’s not just family photos either. Here’s an image pulled straight off a DeviantART gallery page (it’s even watermarked!)
And here’s the unlicensed toddler shirt design. Notice the remarkable similarities here:
[If you want to read the original story behind this, you can check it out here http://su.pr/2m233S ]
So what can we do to protect ourselves?
So what can we do as artists to protect ourselves and our work from being ripped off, while still allowing our friends and potential customers to marvel at our creative brilliance? In order to answer this question, we put the Skinny staff on the case and did some research.
Unfortunately after scouring the web, it turns out the only 100% foolproof method of protecting our work from these thievin’ bastards is to avoid putting your stuff on the internet in the first place.
At first I was going to simply end this article here, call it a day, and burn my ethernet cable. . . Soon, however, I realized that for those of us who are desperately trying to market ourselves as artists and sell our work online, avoiding the internet all together is probably not really an option.
So we began to dig a little deeper. . .
Turns out there’s some good news and some not-so-good news
The not-so-good news is that you’re going to have to accept the fact that for every so-called solution to stop people from stealing your work, there always seems to be an easily found workaround (heck if we can find it, I pretty sure anyone can). So the bottom line here is that if it’s on the internet and someone wants it bad enough, they can probably get it and you’re not going to be able to stop them.
Wow, that sucks!
Now having said that, there are still several things you can do to deter would-be thieves from stealing your stuff. In other words, if you manage to make it difficult enough for them, they may simply give up and move on to easier prey.
[Please note that in order to keep this article to a somewhat managable length, we're only going to be talking about protecting your online images. We could talk about some methods of protecting your music, videos, and text in a future post if there seems to be enough interest from the Skinny Artist community.]
Protecting your Images Online 101
The first thing that most people don’t realize is that by the time you are able to see a website like this one, the HTML and all of the images on the page have already been downloaded to your computer. That’s simply the way your internet browser works. In other words, the only way to block this from happening is to not have your images on the page in the first place.
2 Things that Don’t Work
Using Fancy-pants Technology
Now before all of you computer-savvy artists out there start screaming at me that the solution to this problem is to put all of your images in a Flash file, streaming media, or nestled safely away in a Java applet. You have to realize that the problem with using these technologies is the fact that not every browser (and the people using them) have the broadband speed, patience, or the technology to view these images. And while it’s true that it takes a bit of technological know-how to extract the graphics from a Flash file, it can certainly be done (Trust me, the thieves you’re trying to protect your work from know how).
In the end, you’re going to have to weigh the benefits of deterring any potential thieves with the real possibility of frustrating the beejeebees out your potential customers who are still running IE3 on their Windows 98 desktop. Not to mention that for this to be even marginally effective, you would have to avoid putting your work up on any of the major gallery sites who certainly aren’t going to risk alienating their customers with your fancy-pants technology.
Turning off the Right-Click
During our research, we saw dozens of websites out there that seem to believe that turning off the right-click ability is the holy grail of protecting your images online. Their reasoning is that if you can’t right click on an image and pull up the context menu to “Save Image as. . ” your images are all perfectly safe.
This of course is ridiculous. . .
Not only can turning off the right-click be easily defeated by the thieves, but it annoys the other 99% of people who aren’t trying to steal your stuff but who would like to use their context menu to open new windows or navigate in their browser. Overall disabling the right-click is stupid because it doesn’t stop anyone who would be abusing it, and only irritates the rest of us.
3 Things that Do Work (kind of)
I hate to drive this point into the ground but you have to remember that none of these strategies (even the good ones) are going to be 100% effective. As I said before, if someone wants to steal your stuff, there’s going to be a way to do it. All we can do is to try and make it as difficult as possible for the thieves without annoying everyone else in the process. This means no right-click disabling or fancy-pants Flash galleries.
Shrink-Wrapping your Images
This technique, is one of my favorites only because it involves a bit of technological trickery. The beauty of shrink wrapping your images is the fact that it doesn’t stop anyone from seeing the image, nor does it try to stop them from copying it (like disabling the right-click) Instead it allows them to copy the image, but the image they end up saving is probably not the one they wanted.
Here’s an example of a shrink-wrapped image. Try copying the image below by right-clicking and “Saving it to your computer”
 |
If you did this, you should now have an image called “Image-1987653″ downloaded to your computer. If you open the image, however, you’ll discover that it’s probably not the image you were expecting to find. Don’t worry, it’s not some kind of virus, it’s simply a transparent image that has been shrink-wrapped over top of the image that you thought you were downloading.
Think of it as a clear glass panel laid over top of your image. So when the Mr. Shadypants tries to download your image, he is actually downloading the clear glass panel and not the image underneath it. If you are interested in finding out more about how this is done, I would invite you to visit our How-to Shrink Wrap Your Images tutorial page for quick explanation.
Now you have to realize that this technique does not lock your image up into some kind of impenetrable vault and if the thief knows what they’re doing, there are still ways for them to get the real image. The goal here, however, is that the thief will download the image and then move on before he or she realizes that the image they got, wasn’t the one they thought they were getting.
WaterMarking
Another technique that works well, but obviously isn’t 100% effective, is watermarking or embossing your images with some kind of easily identifiable mark. Watermarking an image is fairly easy and does not interfere with legitimate visitors viewing the image which is why most online galleries like DeviantART use watermarking to protect their artist’s images and discourage any potential theivery.
Virtually any decent graphic program like Photoshop or Paintshop can be use to watermark or emboss an image relatively quickly. There are also several dedicated watermarking programs out there on the market, but I haven’t personally used them. If there is a particular watermarking program that you have used and would recommend, please let us know about it in the comment section below.
If you have access to Photoshop or a similar program, however, watermarking your images is a fast and painless process. If you’re interested, we’ve created a short tutorial on How to Watermark your Images in Photoshop in under two minutes.
[Update: If you are interested in watermarking your images but don't have access to Photoshop, we recently did a short video tutorial on our Skinny WordPress sister site on how to watermark images for free without using Photoshop ]
Slice and Dicing your Images
The last image protecting strategy that we’re going to talk about in this article is called “slice and dice” and comes to us from the dawn of the world wide web . . .
[Cue old-man nostalgic voice]
You see back in it’s infancy, the world wide web didn’t have much in the way of images, audio, or videos. Things were slow and we all connected to it through a screechy little device called a dial-up modem that typically moved at about the same speed as Twitter on a busy day. Because of this, when someone wanted to post an image on one of those new-fangled bulletin boards we often had to chop up the image into several smaller pieces so we didn’t bring the whole internet crashing down with our 200k image file.
So essentially we had two choices, we could either upload really tiny pictures, or we could chop up the larger ones into smaller pieces so that it could load one piece at a time. We then had to reassemble the pieces using HTML. Today, of course, we have no idea what this is like and we get irritated if our HD movie hiccups momentarily as it’s streaming through the T1 line in our parent’s basement. So no one even thinks about “slicing and dicing” our images anymore. . . but maybe we should
Here’s an example of an Image that has been Slice and Diced:
 |
 |
 |
The basic idea here is that we chop our images into smaller pieces and then reassemble them on the webpage using a HTML <table> tag. The beauty of this is that no one except the person who is trying to illegally download your image will ever know that your image has been sliced and diced.
Try to swipe this image!
Try to right-click and download the above image. Depending on where you initially click on the image you will end up downloading that particular piece of the image. So what happens is that instead of downloading the entire image, the thief will end up downloading several smaller pieces and then have to find a way to stitch them back together. While this is certainly doable with one of the higher-end graphics programs, unless they are an unusually motivated thief, chances are they’ll simply give up and move on to an easier target.
So if this is method is so great why doesn’t everyone use it?
While this method seems to work well and is fairly easy to do, it can take a decent amount of time to crop the image and then setup the HTML table to reassemble the pieces on your webpage. If you’re interested in learning more about How to Slice and Dice your Images please visit our new tutorial page.
Conclusion:
The world wide web is a tradeoff for artists who are trying to display and sell their artwork online. On one hand it’s a great place for artists to share their work with a worldwide audience. On the other hand, any images that you put on the web are pretty much fair game if someone wants them bad enough.
That doesn’t mean that we have to simply roll over and give the thieves a free pass however. Simply by using one of the recommended methods listed above, we can frustrate and deter most amateur thieves from stealing our images.
If you know of any other effective methods of protecting your images online, please take moment and tell us about it in the comment section below!
Here are some other articles you might enjoy:
All good ideas. I usually use slice&dice and watermarking and sometimes both in one image.
The other thing is to set your website up so that search engines do not catalog your images. Do this via robot text on one’s website.
For example, included in my robots.txt file code that tells Google not to catalog the images on my website:
User-agent: Googlebot-Image
Disallow: /
Also do not give your images obvious names like: red-dog.jpg
———–
Regarding the shrink wrap idea, the easiest way for the thief to steal the image that is shrink wrapped is right-click the mouse and select “view image info”. When the new page info opens one need only search through images listed, find the “hidden” one and “save as..” to one’s computer.
Image thieves are usually knowledgeable of this work around.
My theory is the longer it takes some one to try to make the image good (remove watermarking, etc.) the less they will want to use it.
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Thanks Charles for stopping by and sharing your thoughts with us!
I think that you’re exactly right when you say that “the longer it takes some one to try to make the image good (remove watermarking, etc.) the less they will want to use it.” I think that combining some of these ideas might be a good idea depending on how much time you are willing to spend and how valuable that particular image is to you.
I also agree 100% that your first line of defense against image thieves is to keep the search engines from cataloging your images in the first place using your “robots.txt” file. In fact, this might be a great idea for a followup post down the road.
It’s interesting, however, because just a few days after I wrote this post I read a very interesting counter-point to this protect-your-art way of thinking by the artist Hazel Dooney on her blog “Self vs. Self”. In it she talks about how we as creative content producers (art, writing, photos, music, etc…) need to shift our attention away from the “product” of our work and back to the “producer” of that work. I’ll let her explain in her own words. . .
Hazel is not only an amazing artist, but quite a radical thinker as well. If you get a chance, I would really encourage you to read her entire “Shifting with the Paradigm” post.
All of this reminded me again about the effect of living in a celebrity crazed culture such as our own. Maybe it’s true that we are no longer interested in buying the product, and instead we are really buying the personality of its creator (ex. Lady Gaga). I’m not sure where exactly that leaves the rest of us who refuse to wear lightbulbs and bubbles as clothing, but it is an interesting argument. . .
Hey, I found that my twitter pictures are on google which I don’t want! I went down to report picture and it came up with you can stop google by typing this into your server root?? I don’t know what that is? Any help?
Twitter: gwennpaints
says:
After the Napster / Metallica meltdown, it’s pretty clear to me that art-in-reproduction is no longer for sale, it’s for sharing.
As Cory Doctrow put it in the documentary RiP: A Remix Manifesto…
“Before the radio and the record came along, the only way that people made money from making music was by standing in a hall and being charismatic. The fact is: technology giveth, and technology taketh away. What was a business model in 1909 may be the business model in 2009. What was the business model in 1939 may not be the business model in 2007. That’s how it goes.”
Visual artists are actually the luckiest kind of artists today. Even if our stuff gets appropriated online, we still have the originals to sell. And, anyway, we all need to stop pretending that we’re creating in a vacuum and instead revel in the fact that culture builds on culture–that all the best artists know how to steal something and make it entirely their own!
It’s called free culture, and it’s about not trying to own art to the point where no one dares consume it for fear of copyright infringement. It’s about making work that’s so entirely original that no one will have a doubt as to who made it.
Eh, I pay for Pandora so that I do not have to hear commercials in order for my Artists to be compensated. I am currently going to school for photography. friends constantly go “where is your art, why do you not post it?” Hmm, I wonder why I don’t post my photographs to facebook? Gee, it seems counterproductive if one is to make a living. Now if one wants me to take photos for them, sure. I’ll post. But if I feel a shot can be something really good in the future, hell I won’t even post it to class. Not until the copyright is in my hand.
Building a portfolio can be tricky in this day and age…
So can being original.
If you come up with something that is original and artfully successful then it is worth protecting like property. Scientific and medical breakthroughs are for sharing as they are educational pursuits; art is individual expression meant for individual gain.
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
I think you nailed it when you said that “technology giveth and technology taketh away” — As artists and writers we tend to forget sometimes that it is this ease of sharing content that drew us to putting our work online to begin with.
We forget that ten years ago, this world wide web thing was all simply a novelty. Twenty years ago, it was completely unheard of. I would guess that if you went back and asked any musician or artist back then if they would be willing to show off their creative work on a platform that would make it fairly easy for someone to steal it and pass it off as their own, they probably would have laughed in your face.
So why do we do it?
We do it because we know that it’s still the easiest way to get our work exposed to potentially millions of people around the world. Not that any of us want our stuff to be ripped off, but maybe instead of spending our time trying to fight off these internet parasites, we would be better off using that time to create new work and as you said, “making work that’s so entirely original that no one will have a doubt as to who made it.”
You’re right when you say that visual artists are the luckiest kind of artists today. Then again, you’ve always been the cool kids on the block. After all, it wasn’t that long ago that musicians were merely thought of as blue-collar workman used to fulfill the composer’s artistic vision, and writers. . . well writers have always been the introverted little stepchildren of the artistic world. While the visual artists were busy collecting patrons, we were busy nurturing our neurosis alone in our musty little rooms (except now we sit at Starbucks) — Some things never change!
This site will help all digital artist’s. It’s amazing! and it’s free.
http://www.copyrightclamp.com
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Hi Chris,
This site/tool looks interesting, although I am curious what your relationship is with this particular company. I always encourage our readers to share valuable resources that they find around the web (especially free ones) however, the fact that you posted this link under two different names starts to make me wonder. Just be honest with us, and we’ll be happy to check out this resource.
All the best,
Drew
Even the methods that make right-click saving difficult are easily circumvented by making a screenshot. Furthermore, you can only use those on your own website. The usual portfolio websites – deviantart, epilogue, CGhub, etc. – won’t let you do this, you can only upload the actual artwork image files there.
Therefore, in my opinion, these methods are quite useless. What I think might be better:
1) Watermarks, as you mentioned. Both well-known and unknown artists’ work alike is stolen, but the work of the unknown artist can be identified more easily if it has a watermark (Few thieves make the effort of removing a watermark).
2) Promote your work! Yes, that makes it more available for thieves, but that’s really no reason not to do so. More exposure also means more chance of recognition if it’s stolen. Luis Royo’s work, for example, is often stolen but also very easily identified because it’s so well known.
3) I assume you all know http://www.tineye.com . Their image library is still small but can be very helpful.
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Thanks Kristina for stopping by and sharing your ideas with us
I think you’re right when you say that the more you promote your artwork and get it out there online, the more people will begin to know you and recognize your unique style.
We tend to forget that although the worldwide art world is huge, the online art community is far smaller and much more interconnected. Those artists who share their work online and are actively involved in networking sites such as DeviantArt, RedBubble, Facebook, and even Twitter are far more likely to have their pirated work noticed by one of their online connections.
The concept behind TinEye looks to be very promising for visual artists and especially photographers who are attempting to keep track of their work online. I would be very interested in hearing from artists who have used TinEye and what they have discovered about how their work has been used (or abused) online.
In the long-term, however, I think that we are better off finding a way to shift our focus away from protecting the old and instead using that time and energy towards creating our next work. Easier said than done I know. Most of us (including myself) become so emotionally attached and protective over our work that it becomes difficult to let go and move on. . .
Na realidade nao estou preocupada com as fotos do meu site e sim daquelas que coloco no facebook, alem de ser fotografa faco alteracoes nas fotos, um photoshop bem natural e maquiagem digital, mostro o meu trabalho, assim as pessoas ficam interessadas e compram pois tambem imprimo e coloco em album personalizado, mas o que vejo acontecendo, as pessoas pedem os retoques como se nao fosse perder meu tempo e ainda nao pagam. Restauracao entao, nem se fala, da o maior trabalho e elas pedem…pedem…e eu boba, faco e entrego.
Ontem msm um amigo me chamou a atencao, poxa, vc trabalha horas e nao recebe pq acham que e’ um hobby
teu e agradecem como favor???? Dai achei voce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Por favor, o que eu poderia fazer para nao fazerem download da foto ou salva-la? A marca d’agua e’ excelente ideia
mas acho que fica tao inapropriado e deselegante….sei la’….teria uma outra ideia amigo?
Desde ja, te agradeco e parabens!!!!
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Obrigado por acessar e compartilhar seus pensamentos com a gente! Concordo com você que watermarking não é muito atraente, mas parece ser a melhor opção disponível.
Thank you Leo for stopping by and sharing your thoughts with us! I agree with you that watermarking is not very attractive but it does seem to be one of the best options available.
My question is once the art has been stolen and I have asked them to remove the art from their website and they still continue to use it..How do we find out whose behind a website if no business name or phone is on the site?
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
That’s a great question Vicki. One online tool that I generally recommend to find out who’s behind a particular website is Network Solutions WhoIs database search which you can find here http://www.networksolutions.com/whois where you can usually find the contact information of the website owner. However, if they have a privacy feature enabled, it will only show the name of the website hosting company which you can also file a complaint directly using the contact information provided. The DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) requires that individuals and hosting companies remove the copyrighted material from their site quickly once they have been notified of the violation. If you’re interested, you can find out more about the DMCA here at the Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
Hope that helps!
Super reply! I have found everything I needed from your link and sent them email today (Dec 7, 2011) I found so much stolen artwork that I was sickened. GoDaddy.com is the hosting agent and Wallace Internet Properties are the folks stealing. Wallace has several internet sites that distribute “Computer Wallpaper” that they have stolen from various places around the web. I also see that they generate money everyday from these sites. If they don’t removed it can I sue? And if so I wonder for how much? It just makes me so mad!!
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
I’m glad it was helpful Vicki
Hopefully once they realized that they’ve been caught they will do the right thing and take your stolen artwork (and everyone else’s) off their website and find something else more productive to do with their time. Usually if it’s as large-scale operation as it sounds, however, things could get a little tricky depending on how much money they are actually making on these websites.
At this point I would simply stay after them with repeated emails and try to get as much contact info as you can. If nothing happens, inform then that your next step will be to contact their hosting company (GoDaddy) which is your right under the DMCA and start the process to have their hosting account suspended. Now of course I’m not a lawyer or any type of legal expert, but the way I understand it the hosting company can also be held liable so they should be much more responsive.
Good luck and please let us know how it all turns out!
Over 20 emails with ZERO responses and then a break through because of your link…I contacted Go Daddy.com and reported the abuse, in turn GoDaddy.com wanted me to fill out a form that proves my art was indeed copyright protected. I told them it does not need to be protected, that it mine, that I created it and I have proof…but they wanted me to send in the $65 to have it protected with an agency…BULLSHiT is what I thought. At any rate I found out through GoDaddy the information I needed to phone the guy and email him…and guess what HE called me back and is removing the art. He has at least 30 different websites all of which offer out free art for downloads and I am sure that most of it is pirated art. But! I won my battle. The guy makes about $1000. a month through all the sites he owns. I told him if he doesn’t take my art down I will sue. I think I finally won a battle…wish he had removed the art months ago when I first asked. If any of you want to search and see if your art is being handed out through him search “Wallace Internet Properties.”
My jaw about dropped seeing that family photo in a advertisement! WOW! I’m currently trying to shrink wrap images my self but nothing seems to be working….
This is an excellent article
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Thank you for your kind words, I’m happy that you found this article to be useful. Shrink wrapping images does take a bit of practice, however, once you are familiar with it and you get it working, you can often copy and paste most of the HTML code for all your other images. Good luck!
Very interesting article and more interesting ideas in some of the comments. I’m going to be taking a closer look at shrink-wrapping and the robots.txt option.
Both of the image stealing stories at the beginning of the article (the family photo and the hippo/buttterfly artwork) were stolen to be printed. Personally (when I remember) I try to post my images in a compact form – as compromised JPEGs – and at never more than 110dpi. The result can be printed out, but will only look good in a very small format.
However, my feeling is that if someone wants to borrow one of my digital images to use on line – and if they’re prepared to give me credit – then, good luck to them! If they want to use one of my pictures in print though, that’s a different matter…
The truth is as you state – if you don’t want people to use your images, then don’t post them. If you DO post them, then look on them as “loss leaders” – something you’re giving away in the hope of attracting customers/fans/followers/like-minded network buddies. I would love to get paid for some of my images, but till that happy day it’s really encouraging to get praise, positive comments, “likes” and messages from people you’ve never met saying they have used one of your CC licensed pictures or asking for permission to use one where the licensing isn’t clear.
I for one would also be interested to see a further article on protecting text.
Thanks again!
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
I think that’s a great way of looking at this complicated issue John.
You’re right that it is sometimes hard to draw the line these days between what to share and what to “keep protected” offline. In fact, this whole idea of sharing our work online through social media sites like Flickr, DeviantArt, or even Facebook is still so new that we are all still adjusting to this new way of looking at “ownership” and what exactly is okay and not okay to do with our work online.
Luckily, all of us are in the same boat and I think that over time we’ll at least individually figure out what we are comfortable with in terms of people “borrowing” our work without attribution. I know that I’m still trying to figure this all out myself, but it turns out that so far my best defense against these content thieves has been to not create much material worth stealing
Actually the second image is not the same one stolen (the watermarked one). It was traced, or copied, a shadier kind of stealing… so the size doesn’t actually matters to these people. They can copy any image in whatever size they want unfortunately. Shameless plagiarizing.
I had to write and tell you that this article is so helpful. I literally discovered another blogger not only stealing my self created unique photos, but entire content and publishing it on their blog as their own. I am out using Google to find ways to protect myself. I feel completely ripped off and irritated. I don’t even consider myself to be that creative, so when I found the few things I make that are uniquely me stolen, I got very agitated. Maybe if I felt I had creativity flying out of me I wouldn’t be so ticked. Anyway, thanks for being my afternoon therapist and thank you for the shrink wrapping tip in particular.
Twitter: SkinnyArtist
says:
Wow that really sucks
Unfortunately, this type of thing is becoming far too common online. At first it was pirating music and movies online, now it seems these online thieves are branching out and have moved on to “content scraping” which is where they simply rip off your creative content (writing, pictures, music, or whatever) and use your content to get them some traffic from Google and then try to sell people stuff from their affiliate links.
Sooner or later the technology for sniffing out and stopping these idiots will catch up to them and hopefully those of us who create original content online will still be around. Thanks again for your kind words about the article, I hope that this whole experience won’t deter you from sharing your work online.
Keep creating and don’t let the bastards win!
Digimarc
http://www.digimarc.com/
Copyright info encoded right into the image
You can search the web for anywhere your image is being used.
Also the data is still readable if the image is resized or printed, and I think recolored.
Only thing is the basic service cost about $50 a year.
But, if people are buying your prints–or you think they will eventually–then I think the equivalent of a little over $4 a month is worth it.
So, my photographs on my website are photographs of products, not art per se, but I still don’t want lazy people to use them. According to Vickie F. they don’t have to be copyrighted for it to be considered theft? Just wondering if I should watermark even my product photos.
Once again, great information. Thanks for sharing.
Ronna